{"id":433,"date":"2026-03-25T11:21:55","date_gmt":"2026-03-25T11:21:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/2026\/03\/25\/the-rest-of-the-world-report-wednesday-march-25-2026-morning-edition\/"},"modified":"2026-03-25T11:21:55","modified_gmt":"2026-03-25T11:21:55","slug":"the-rest-of-the-world-report-wednesday-march-25-2026-morning-edition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/2026\/03\/25\/the-rest-of-the-world-report-wednesday-march-25-2026-morning-edition\/","title":{"rendered":"The Rest of the World Report | Wednesday, March 25, 2026 \u2014 Morning Edition"},"content":{"rendered":"

Day 26 | Iran War & Beyond<\/h3>\n
<\/div>\n

Weekday morning and evening editions. Saturdays once. Sundays once. All sources labeled. Translator notes on every story.<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

WAR DAY 26 | NUMBERS AT PUBLICATION<\/strong>
\ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddf7 Iran: 1,500+ killed (Health Ministry \u2014 FROZEN since ~Day 7). HRANA: 3,200+ including 214+ children. 82,000+ civilian structures damaged or destroyed (Iranian Red Crescent). Full toll unknown.
\ud83c\uddf1\ud83c\udde7 Lebanon: 1,039+ killed including 118 children (Lebanese Health Ministry) \/ 1,000,000+ displaced.
\ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddf1 Israel: 16+ killed by Iranian strikes. Overnight: IDF struck naval cruise missile production sites in Tehran. Continued Iranian barrages reported across Israel.
\ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddf6 Iraq: 15 PMF fighters killed in US strike on Anbar headquarters Monday night \u2014 deadliest single US strike in Iraq since February 28. Iraq\u2019s National Security Council authorized PMF to respond \u201cwith all available means.\u201d
\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 US: 13 KIA \/ 290 wounded (AP, updated March 24). 82nd Airborne deployment orders written; troops expected to move in coming days.
\ud83d\udee2\ufe0f Brent crude: ~$98\u2013101 \u2014 fell close to 6% overnight as 15-point plan news broke and Hormuz partial opening confirmed. After touching $104.49 Tuesday close, pulled back below $100 in early Wednesday trading (ITV\/Investing.com<\/a>). US markets open at 9:30 a.m. EST.
\ud83d\udcb0 US gas: $3.96\/gallon (AAA, March 24) \u2014 24th consecutive daily increase.
\ud83d\udcb0 Markets: After-hours futures Tuesday night up 0.7%+ on peace plan report. Full picture at open.
\ud83c\udf10 Iran internet blackout: 560+ hours (NetBlocks, estimated).<\/p>\n

\n

1. THE 15 POINTS \u2014 AND WHAT IRAN AGREED TO BEFORE THE WAR BEGAN<\/h3>\n

The United States has sent Iran a 15-point plan to end the war, delivered through Pakistan. Fourteen of its points are now public. Iran\u2019s military called it fiction. Iran\u2019s diplomats are, very quietly, reading it.<\/p>\n

The plan was confirmed Tuesday by the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, Haaretz, and ABC News. Fourteen of the fifteen points have been reported by multiple outlets citing officials familiar with the proposal: Iran must dismantle its nuclear facilities at Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow; end all uranium enrichment on Iranian soil; hand its stockpile of approximately 450 kilograms of 60%-enriched uranium to the IAEA on an agreed timetable; grant the IAEA full access and oversight; abandon its regional proxy paradigm; cease funding and arming proxies; commit to Hormuz as a free maritime corridor; accept limits on its ballistic missile program in range and quantity; restrict future missile use to self-defense only. In return: full sanctions relief, and US assistance for Iran\u2019s civilian nuclear program at Bushehr. Israel\u2019s Channel 12 reported the US is also proposing a one-month ceasefire to allow discussion of the framework.<\/p>\n

There is a problem with presenting this as new. It is not, in any meaningful sense, new \u2014 at least not its nuclear core.<\/p>\n

On February 27, 2026 \u2014 one day before the US and Israel struck Iran \u2014 Oman\u2019s Foreign Minister Badr Al-Busaidi announced that a breakthrough had been reached in ongoing nuclear negotiations. Iran had agreed to never stockpile enriched uranium, to full IAEA verification, and to irreversibly downgrade its current enriched uranium to the lowest level possible. He said peace was \u201cwithin reach.\u201d A fourth round of talks was scheduled for Vienna the following week. The US and Israel attacked Iran the next day. Al-Busaidi later said that \u201cactive and serious negotiations\u201d had been undermined. Reports from the negotiations cited him characterising the war as an attempt to reorder the Middle East in Israel\u2019s favour.<\/p>\n

The nuclear architecture of the current 15-point plan \u2014 no enrichment, IAEA access, uranium handover \u2014 maps closely onto what Iran had already agreed to in principle before February 28. What is genuinely new in the plan: the demand to dismantle all three nuclear sites entirely, the proxy abandonment requirement, the formal ballistic missile limits, and the Hormuz corridor commitment as a treaty term. Also new, and significant: the plan does not appear to include regime change as a condition. That is a retreat from the war\u2019s stated objectives. The Islamic Republic, as currently constituted, would survive under the deal as described.<\/p>\n

Iran\u2019s military responded Wednesday with contempt. Lt. Col. Ebrahim Zolfaghari, spokesperson for Iran\u2019s unified armed forces command: \u201cHas the level of your inner struggle reached the stage of you negotiating with yourself?\u201d And: \u201cSomeone like us will never come to terms with someone like you. Not now, not ever.\u201d The IRGC-dominated military command\u2019s rejection was total and public.<\/p>\n

Iran\u2019s diplomatic track tells a different story. FM Araghchi held calls Wednesday with Pakistan, Egypt, and Oman \u2014 all key intermediaries. Iran\u2019s ambassador to Pakistan acknowledged that \u201cfriendly countries seek to lay the ground for dialogue.\u201d A Haaretz source said Iran \u201cdisputed certain points but is considering the offer.\u201d The NYT noted it was unclear how widely the plan had been circulated among Iranian officials, or whether Tehran\u2019s decision-making structure had formally processed it. Iran has also stated explicitly that it cannot negotiate with the US because Washington attacked it twice during active negotiations \u2014 once during the Twelve-Day War in June 2025, and again on February 28. Publicly accepting talks under bombardment would be domestically untenable and would signal that military pressure works. Iran\u2019s public and private positions are not the same thing.<\/p>\n

Israel is not signed onto the plan. Jerusalem Post confirmed Israel was informed but has significant concerns about a \u201cframework agreement\u201d \u2014 meaning Jerusalem wants capitulation, not a deal that leaves the Islamic Republic standing. Israeli military spokesman Effie Defrin said Wednesday that the war plan is \u201cunchanged\u201d and will continue \u201cto deepen the damage and remove existential threats.\u201d Israel\u2019s UN Ambassador said plainly this week: Israel is not part of the Pakistan talks, and will keep striking.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf0d TRANSLATOR\u2019S NOTE:<\/strong> The international press is running the 15-point plan story with a context that US coverage is largely omitting: the plan\u2019s nuclear terms bear a strong resemblance to what Iran had already agreed to before the war started. The Oman mediator\u2019s public statement \u2014 that \u201cactive and serious negotiations were undermined\u201d by the February 28 attack \u2014 has been widely cited in Arab, European, and Asian press as the essential frame for understanding why Iran is not rushing to embrace terms it had already accepted in principle, then watched a war begin anyway. Al Jazeera, France 24, and the BBC have all noted this gap. Gulf press is noting a second gap: the plan, as described, requires Iran to abandon its proxy network \u2014 Hezbollah, the Houthis, Iraqi PMF factions, Palestinian armed groups. That is not a negotiating concession. That is a demand for Iran to surrender the strategic architecture it has spent forty years building. Several regional analysts quoted in Arab press describe the gap between the plan\u2019s demands and anything Iran could publicly accept as \u201cunbridgeable in its current form.\u201d<\/p>\n

\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 WHAT AMERICAN READERS NEED TO KNOW:<\/strong> The US sent Iran a peace plan. Iran\u2019s military said it would never deal with Washington. Iran\u2019s diplomats are quietly listening through intermediaries. Most of what the plan asks on nuclear questions is what Iran had already agreed to before the US attacked it. What is new is significantly harder: dismantling all three nuclear sites, abandoning the proxy network, formal missile limits. Israel is not part of the talks and is still striking Iran. The five-day window opened Monday. Day 3 of 5.<\/p>\n

Sources: New York Times (US, centre-left \u2014 15-point plan confirmation, Pakistani delivery); Wall Street Journal (US, centre-right \u2014 plan contents, nuclear sites dismantlement); Bloomberg (international wire \u2014 15-point plan confirmation); Haaretz (Israel, independent, centre-left \u2014 \u201cconsidering the offer,\u201d Iran disputed certain points); ABC News (US \u2014 plan addresses nuclear, missile, Hormuz); Jerusalem Post (Israel, independent \u2014 Israel concerns, \u201cframework agreement\u201d); Israel Channel 12\/N12 (Israel \u2014 one-month ceasefire proposal, three sources); RTE\/ITV (Ireland\/UK \u2014 Zolfaghari military rejection quotes); 2025\u20132026 Iran-US negotiations record (Wikipedia summary \u2014 Oman breakthrough February 27, Al-Busaidi \u201cactive and serious negotiations undermined\u201d); Al Jazeera (Qatar, state-funded\/editorially independent \u2014 Iran diplomatic calls, ambassador statement); France 24 (France, public broadcaster \u2014 pre-war overlap framing)<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

2. HORMUZ ON IRAN\u2019S TERMS \u2014 AND WHY SHIPS ARE STILL NOT MOVING<\/h3>\n

Iran has formally told the world it will allow ships to pass through the Strait of Hormuz. A Thai oil tanker passed through Wednesday with assistance from Iranian and Omani authorities. Five vessels are transiting daily. The pre-war average was 120.<\/p>\n

Iran\u2019s foreign ministry sent a letter to the International Maritime Organization, dated March 22 and circulated to member states this week, stating that \u201cnon-hostile vessels\u201d may transit the Strait \u201cprovided that they neither participate in nor support acts of aggression against Iran and fully comply with the declared safety and security regulations \u2014 in coordination with the competent Iranian authorities.\u201d That last clause is the operative one. Passage requires coordination with Iran. Iran decides who is hostile. Iran sets the safety regulations. Iran is, in effect, converting the world\u2019s most critical energy chokepoint into a managed, permissioned corridor under its sovereignty.<\/p>\n

In practice, the strait is mostly still closed. Insurance companies are not covering Gulf transits \u2014 without war risk coverage, ship owners will not send vessels regardless of what any government says. The five vessels tracked Monday via AIS signals represent roughly 4% of normal daily traffic. A Thai tanker completed a transit Wednesday \u2014 the company said it coordinated with Iranian and Omani authorities and the ship is now crossing the Indian Ocean bound for Thailand in early April. That is a data point, not a reopening.<\/p>\n

What Iran has also signaled, through a senior official speaking to India Today, is that Hormuz toll arrangements will continue even after any eventual deal. An Iranian lawmaker confirmed the toll structure on the record last week: up to $2 million per voyage, coordinated through Iranian authorities. Bloomberg and Lloyd\u2019s List Intelligence have both confirmed at least two vessels have paid. The IRGC Navy turned back one container ship, the Selen, for \u201cfailing to comply with legal protocols.\u201d This is not a strait in the process of reopening. It is a strait in the process of being restructured under new terms.<\/p>\n

ITV reported overnight that Brent fell close to 6% on the combination of the 15-point plan news and the Hormuz partial opening announcement \u2014 briefly touching below $100 for the first time since before Monday\u2019s peace-talk rally. The market is pricing in the possibility of a deal while not fully believing in one.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf0d TRANSLATOR\u2019S NOTE:<\/strong> The IMO letter and the Hormuz \u201creopening\u201d are being covered very differently in shipping trade press versus general news. Lloyd\u2019s List, Marine Traffic, and The Maritime Executive are all clear that the practical reopening is minimal \u2014 insurance remains unavailable, the toll structure is unresolved, and \u201ccoordination with Iranian authorities\u201d is not a framework that commercial shipping companies will operate under at scale. Gulf Arab press \u2014 particularly in the UAE and Saudi Arabia \u2014 is noting with concern that Iran\u2019s letter to the IMO establishes, for the first time in a formal document circulated to all member states, the principle that Iran has sovereign authority over Hormuz transit. That is a significant legal and geopolitical claim regardless of whether a ceasefire is reached. If it becomes the postwar norm, the era of genuinely free passage through Hormuz may be over.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 WHAT AMERICAN READERS NEED TO KNOW:<\/strong> Iran said ships can pass. One Thai tanker did. Five vessels are transiting daily where 120 used to. Insurance companies are not covering the route. Iran is charging up to $2 million per voyage and plans to keep doing so. The strait is open on Iran\u2019s terms, which means it is not fully open. US gas is $3.96 a gallon and rising. The five-day window is not fixing the pump price \u2014 because the strait\u2019s practical closure is not ending.<\/p>\n

Sources: Al Jazeera (Qatar, state-funded\/editorially independent \u2014 IMO letter text, \u201cnon-hostile vessels\u201d conditions); Bloomberg (international wire \u2014 $2 million toll confirmed, currency unclear); Lloyd\u2019s List Intelligence (UK, independent shipping trade press \u2014 two confirmed payments, Selen turned back, Larak corridor); Times of Israel (Israel, independent \u2014 IMO communique text, dated March 22); ITV (UK \u2014 Brent fell close to 6% overnight, below $100); The Maritime Executive (US, independent trade press \u2014 practical reopening minimal, insurance unavailable); India Today (India \u2014 senior Iranian official: toll arrangements permanent); Bangchak company statement (primary \u2014 Thai tanker transit confirmed, Iranian\/Omani coordination)<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

3. IRAQ: THE THIRD FRONT<\/h3>\n

The United States killed the Popular Mobilization Forces\u2019 Anbar operations commander and 14 of his fighters during a security meeting at PMF headquarters in Anbar province Monday night. It was the deadliest single US strike on Iraqi soil since the war began on February 28. Iraq\u2019s government has now formally authorized the PMF to respond with all available means.<\/p>\n

The strike hit during an active command meeting at Habbaniyah air base. Saad al-Baiji, the PMF\u2019s Anbar operations commander, was killed along with 14 colleagues. Up to 30 total killed and wounded, with several critically injured, per Reuters and Al Arabiya. Hours later, a separate drone struck the PMF\u2019s national headquarters in Nineveh \u2014 the PMF\u2019s national leader Falih al-Fayyadh was not present. On Wednesday, a strike hit a military clinic at Al-Habbaniyah, killing 7 Iraqi soldiers and wounding 13. Iraq\u2019s Defence Ministry called it a breach of international law. Neither the US nor Israel has claimed responsibility for any of these strikes.<\/p>\n

The formal Iraqi government response escalated significantly on Tuesday. Prime Minister al-Sudani convened an emergency session of the Ministerial Council for National Security. The council issued a decision authorizing the PMF and other security forces to respond \u201cwith all available means based on the principle of self-defence.\u201d Iraq\u2019s foreign ministry was simultaneously ordered to summon the US charg\u00e9 d\u2019affaires and the Iranian ambassador \u2014 protesting US strikes on the PMF and Iranian strikes on Kurdish Peshmerga forces. Six Kurdish Peshmerga fighters were killed by Iranian ballistic missiles targeting the 7th Infantry Division near Erbil, an attack that the Kurdish regional government condemned as a \u201chostile act of injustice and treachery.\u201d<\/p>\n

Iraq is formally protesting both belligerents simultaneously. It is being struck from two directions by two powers fighting each other on its soil.<\/p>\n

The constitutional dimension is one American coverage is consistently underweighting. The PMF is not a militia in the legal sense. It was formally integrated into Iraq\u2019s state security forces in 2017, following the defeat of ISIS. Its members are Iraqi government soldiers. When the US strikes PMF command headquarters during active security meetings, it is legally striking Iraqi military personnel. Iraq\u2019s National Security Council said so directly, describing the Anbar strike as a \u201cgrave violation of Iraqi sovereignty, including the targeting of official security headquarters.\u201d This is a different category of problem than striking Iran-backed groups operating outside Iraqi law.<\/p>\n

The history here accelerates quickly. In late 2019, US strikes on Kataib Hezbollah triggered the storming of the US embassy in Baghdad and a spiral of escalation that ended with the assassination of Qasem Soleimani in January 2020, bringing the region to the edge of full regional war. Since February 28, Iran-backed Iraqi groups have launched over 300 missile and drone attacks on US targets in Iraq. Kataib Hezbollah had announced a five-day pause in attacks on the US embassy \u2014 that pause is now under severe pressure following the Anbar strike.<\/p>\n

There is one more complicating factor: Iraq has no functioning government. National elections were held in November 2025. A new prime minister has not been selected. Al-Sudani is governing as a caretaker with limited constitutional authority. The process of forming a new government \u2014 always shaped by US-Iran competition \u2014 is now occurring in the middle of a war in which both powers are killing people on Iraqi territory. Whoever emerges as prime minister will face an immediate decision: expel US forces, as Iran and its allies are demanding, or continue the balancing act. That decision will reshape the region regardless of how the Iran war ends.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf0d TRANSLATOR\u2019S NOTE:<\/strong> The Iraq story is receiving significant coverage in Arab regional press \u2014 Al Jazeera, Al Arabiya, The National, and the Soufan Center have all framed it as the most dangerous secondary escalation of the war. The framing in regional press is consistent with the formal legal analysis: the US is striking official Iraqi military headquarters, Iraq\u2019s government has authorized retaliation, and the country has no functional executive to manage the crisis. The Soufan Center\u2019s analysis is particularly pointed, noting that hardline Iraqi militias are now attacking US targets across the country \u2014 diplomatic facilities, oil fields, hotels, residential areas \u2014 and that the cycle mirrors the 2019-2020 escalation spiral that led to Soleimani\u2019s killing. The difference now is that the regional war that was narrowly avoided in 2020 is already underway. There is less margin for error.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 WHAT AMERICAN READERS NEED TO KNOW:<\/strong> The US killed an Iraqi military commander during a security meeting. Iraq\u2019s government formally authorized retaliation. Iraq is also being struck by Iran. Baghdad is protesting both sides simultaneously and has no sitting government to manage the crisis. Over 300 attacks have already been launched on US positions in Iraq since February 28. The cycle that produced Soleimani\u2019s killing in 2020 is turning again in a far more volatile environment. Nobody is leading with this story. They should be.<\/p>\n

Sources: Reuters (international wire \u2014 15 killed, 30 killed\/wounded, strike during security meeting); Al Arabiya (Saudi Arabia, UAE-based \u2014 death toll, Habbaniyah headquarters); Al Jazeera (Qatar, state-funded\/editorially independent \u2014 Iraq summons envoys, NSC authorization); The National (UAE, independent \u2014 NSC \u201call available means\u201d decision, Fayyadh headquarters strike, Peshmerga deaths); Soufan Center analysis (US, independent \u2014 Iraq unable to avoid crossfire, historical cycle); Iraq PM al-Sudani office statement (primary \u2014 formal notes of protest, sovereignty violation); Kurdistan Peshmerga Ministry statement (primary \u2014 6 killed, 30 wounded, \u201chostile act\u201d); PMF statement (primary \u2014 Saad al-Baiji killed, \u201ctreacherous American targeting\u201d); Iraq Defence Ministry statement (primary \u2014 military clinic strike, international law breach)<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

4. WHILE THE WORLD WATCHES IRAN: RUSSIA LAUNCHES ONE OF ITS LARGEST ATTACKS ON UKRAINE<\/h3>\n

Russia launched nearly 1,000 drones against Ukraine in a 24-hour period on Tuesday \u2014 one of the largest aerial attacks of the entire war. A UNESCO World Heritage Site in Lviv is burning. A maternity hospital was damaged. ISW has confirmed Russia\u2019s Spring-Summer 2026 offensive has begun. Ukraine, simultaneously, struck Russia\u2019s largest Baltic oil export hub.<\/p>\n

The drone barrage began overnight March 23-24 and continued through Tuesday in a rare daytime wave, with more than 550 drones targeting central and western regions \u2014 areas far from the front lines and not previously subject to this intensity of daytime attack. At least 7 people were killed across Ukraine. More than 40 were wounded, including at least 5 children. Damage was reported across 11 regions in total.<\/p>\n

The headline strikes: In Lviv, Russia targeted the historic city centre in broad daylight. Drones hit the Bernardine Monastery Complex \u2014 a UNESCO World Heritage Site \u2014 and fire broke out at St Andrew\u2019s Church, a building dating to the early 17th century. At least 22 were wounded in Lviv. In Ivano-Frankivsk, two people were killed \u2014 a National Guard soldier and his 15-year-old daughter, who were visiting his wife at a maternity hospital that was also damaged in the strike. A 6-year-old was among those injured. Cluster munition ballistic missiles struck Kharkiv. Zhytomyr, Vinnytsia, Ternopil, Khmelnytskyi, Rivne, Dnipropetrovsk and several other regions were also struck.<\/p>\n

General Syrsky, Ukraine\u2019s commander-in-chief, confirmed that Russian forces nearly doubled their offensive actions in the week prior, making simultaneous breakthrough attempts on multiple strategic fronts. The Institute for the Study of War assessed on Monday that Russia\u2019s Spring-Summer 2026 offensive has formally begun. Russia also captured the village of Potapivka in Sumy region, part of its ongoing \u201cbuffer zone\u201d campaign in Ukraine\u2019s north.<\/p>\n

Ukraine\u2019s response was deep inside Russia. On the night of March 22-23, Ukrainian forces struck the Transneft-Port Primorsk oil terminal on the Baltic Sea \u2014 Russia\u2019s largest Baltic oil export hub, located approximately 675 miles from the Ukrainian border and just 50 kilometers from the Finnish border. Satellite imagery confirmed at least four tanks on fire. Operations were suspended at both Primorsk and Ust-Luga ports, cutting off a combined capacity of roughly 1.3 million barrels per day of crude and diesel. Ukraine\u2019s General Staff confirmed it also struck the Bashneft-Ufaneftekhim refinery in Ufa, Bashkortostan \u2014 approximately 870 miles from the border \u2014 which it described as a key link in Russia\u2019s military fuel supply chain.<\/p>\n

Zelenskyy made explicit in his evening address Tuesday what the international press has been slow to connect: Russia is \u201chelping the Iranian regime carry out strikes across the region.\u201d He said the Iran war is \u201cemboldening\u201d Russia and that Ukraine faces a missile deficit because Washington\u2019s attention and weapons supply are focused on Iran. The two wars are not separate conflicts running in parallel. They are feeding each other.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf0d TRANSLATOR\u2019S NOTE:<\/strong> The scale of Russia\u2019s attack \u2014 948 drones in 24 hours, daytime waves targeting western cities, a UNESCO site on fire, a maternity hospital struck \u2014 received prominent coverage across European press Tuesday. The BBC, Le Monde, Der Spiegel, and Corriere della Sera all led with it or gave it significant front-page placement. The frame in European press is consistent: Russia is taking advantage of Western attention being consumed by the Iran war. NATO countries are watching the US divert weapons and political focus to the Middle East while Russia accelerates its spring offensive. Zelenskyy\u2019s explicit statement connecting Russian military cooperation with Iran\u2019s strike campaign is being taken seriously in European capitals \u2014 if confirmed at the intelligence level, it would represent a formal military alliance between two countries simultaneously at war with US interests. Ukraine\u2019s strikes on Primorsk and Ufa \u2014 675 and 870 miles from the border respectively \u2014 are being covered in European financial press as a deliberate campaign to hit Russia\u2019s oil revenues at a moment when high energy prices are giving Moscow additional financial cushion. The IEA has confirmed that US and EU sanctions relief on Russian crude, introduced to ease the global energy crisis, is partially offsetting Ukraine\u2019s ability to pressure Russia economically. The US is simultaneously fighting Iran and subsidising Russia\u2019s war chest.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 WHAT AMERICAN READERS NEED TO KNOW:<\/strong> Russia launched one of its largest aerial attacks of the war while American media was focused on Iran. A UNESCO World Heritage Site was struck in broad daylight. A maternity hospital was damaged. Ukraine\u2019s commander-in-chief confirmed Russia\u2019s spring offensive has begun. Ukraine struck Russia\u2019s biggest Baltic oil port in response \u2014 675 miles inside Russian territory. And Ukraine\u2019s president said plainly: Russia is helping Iran carry out strikes, and Ukraine is running short of missiles because Washington is looking elsewhere. These are not two separate wars. They are one interconnected crisis, and the US is actively engaged in only one of them.<\/p>\n

Sources: Al Jazeera (Qatar, state-funded\/editorially independent \u2014 948 drones, spring offensive confirmed); Euronews (EU, independent \u2014 total casualties, 11 regions struck, Ivano-Frankivsk details); CNN (US \u2014 daytime drone wave, maternity hospital, Lviv UNESCO site, Ivano-Frankivsk victims identified); Ukrainska Pravda (Ukraine, independent \u2014 Zelenskyy evening address, \u201cRussia helping Iranian regime\u201d); Kyiv Independent (Ukraine, independent \u2014 Primorsk strike confirmation, Ufa refinery); ISW assessment (US, independent military analysis \u2014 Spring-Summer 2026 offensive confirmed); Moscow Times (Russia, independent, Russia-critical \u2014 Primorsk confirmed, Ust-Luga suspended); General Syrsky statement (primary \u2014 doubled offensive actions, simultaneous breakthrough attempts)<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

5. THE PLAN IRAN REJECTED \u2014 AND THE TERMS IT IS DEMANDING INSTEAD<\/h3>\n

Iran\u2019s military has publicly and emphatically rejected the 15-point plan. Iran\u2019s diplomats have not. And Iran has its own conditions for ending the war \u2014 ones no American outlet is leading with.<\/p>\n

The military rejection came Wednesday from Lt. Col. Ebrahim Zolfaghari: \u201cOur first and last word has been the same from day one, and it will stay that way: Someone like us will never come to terms with someone like you. Not now, not ever.\u201d The unified command of Iran\u2019s armed forces \u2014 dominated by the IRGC \u2014 has been unequivocal. Senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, Mohsen Rezaei, said earlier this week that the war continues until Iran receives \u201cfull compensation for damage sustained,\u201d all economic sanctions are lifted, and \u201clegally binding international guarantees\u201d are obtained to prevent future US interference in Iran. Those are not terms compatible with the 15-point plan.<\/p>\n

Iran\u2019s stated position on its own conditions has also hardened. CGTN reported that Tehran is demanding reparations as a precondition for any talks. Iran\u2019s stated position throughout the war has been that it will not accept a ban on enrichment. Iran has explicitly said Hormuz \u201cwill not return to pre-war conditions\u201d even if the conflict ends \u2014 meaning some form of managed passage, on Iran\u2019s terms, is now Iran\u2019s baseline postwar position regardless of any deal. The Strait of Hormuz as a free maritime corridor is Point 8 of the 15-point plan. It is also something Iran has already said it will never fully concede.<\/p>\n

The structural reason Iran cannot publicly engage is also documented. Iran\u2019s leadership has stated repeatedly that it cannot negotiate with the US because Washington attacked it twice during active negotiations. In June 2025 \u2014 during the Twelve-Day War \u2014 and on February 28, 2026, the US struck Iran while talks were in progress. Oman\u2019s mediator confirmed the February 28 attack came one day after a breakthrough had been reached. From Iran\u2019s perspective, accepting talks now would validate that military pressure produces concessions \u2014 an invitation to further pressure. It would also be domestically impossible in a country where thousands of civilians have been killed, 82,000+ structures destroyed, and the national internet has been blacked out for over 560 hours.<\/p>\n

What Iran is actually doing, behind the public posture: FM Araghchi is talking to Pakistan, Oman, and Egypt. Iran\u2019s ambassador to Pakistan is carefully leaving doors open while publicly denying any talks. The Hormuz IMO letter \u2014 formally opening passage on Iran\u2019s terms \u2014 was dated March 22, before Trump\u2019s Truth Social post, suggesting Iran was already calibrating its moves before the current diplomatic sprint. Iran is not disengaged. It is engaging on its own timeline, through its own channels, at a pace that preserves its domestic political position.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf0d TRANSLATOR\u2019S NOTE:<\/strong> The gap between Iran\u2019s public military position and its private diplomatic activity is being covered with considerably more nuance in Arab and European press than in American outlets. Al Jazeera\u2019s correspondent in Tehran reported Wednesday that there is \u201ca cloud of mistrust\u201d but that Tehran is engaged diplomatically with regional countries. Iran International \u2014 an Iran opposition outlet, which should be read with that in mind \u2014 reported that Trump\u2019s statements are \u201cfracturing\u201d the Iranian regime\u2019s internal coherence, with some officials more open to engagement than others. The Soufan Center\u2019s analysis notes that the caretaker government in Tehran, like the caretaker government in Baghdad, has limited authority to make binding commitments. Any deal that Araghchi or Ghalibaf might reach would need to be ratified by Mojtaba Khamenei \u2014 the new supreme leader who has made no public statement since the war began, and whose actual position on a negotiated settlement is unknown. The person whose decision matters most has not spoken.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 WHAT AMERICAN READERS NEED TO KNOW:<\/strong> Iran\u2019s military says it will never deal with Washington. Iran\u2019s diplomats are talking to everyone who can carry a message to Washington. Iran\u2019s conditions for ending the war include reparations, full sanctions relief, and guarantees against future US interference \u2014 none of which are in the 15-point plan. The person who actually decides \u2014 Mojtaba Khamenei \u2014 has said nothing publicly since the war began. The five-day window has three days left.<\/p>\n

Sources: RTE (Ireland \u2014 Zolfaghari full quote, \u201cnot now, not ever\u201d); EA WorldView (independent \u2014 \u201cIran rejects Trump\u2019s 15-point plan\u201d); CGTN (China, state media \u2014 Iran demands reparations, flagged as state media); Mohsen Rezaei\/Iranian state media (primary \u2014 \u201cfull compensation,\u201d sanctions relief, legal guarantees); Iran International (Iran opposition, London-based \u2014 \u201cfracturing\u201d Iranian regime analysis, note: opposition outlet); Al Jazeera (Qatar, state-funded\/editorially independent \u2014 Araghchi diplomatic calls, \u201ccloud of mistrust\u201d); Newsweek (US \u2014 Ghalibaf denial, \u201cfake news to manipulate markets\u201d); Bloomberg (international wire \u2014 IMO letter dated March 22, predating Truth Social post)<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

6. EDMOND DE ROTHSCHILD: THE EPSTEIN RAID PARIS MISSED<\/h3>\n

On Friday March 20, French investigators searched the Paris offices of Swiss private bank Edmond de Rothschild. France\u2019s Parquet National Financier \u2014 its national financial prosecutor\u2019s office \u2014 confirmed the search publicly on Tuesday. The investigation targets a former employee with documented ties to Jeffrey Epstein, and carries charges of passive corruption of a foreign public official and complicity in that crime.<\/p>\n

The individual at the centre of the French investigation is Fabrice Aidan, a middle-ranking French diplomat who was seconded to the United Nations from 2006 to 2013 and subsequently worked at Edmond de Rothschild from 2014 to 2016. Aidan\u2019s name appeared in more than 200 documents released by the US Department of Justice as part of the Epstein files. Reuters reviewed emails showing Aidan allegedly transferred UN Security Council briefings and other confidential documents to Epstein between 2010 and 2016 \u2014 while he was serving as a UN official \u2014 using both his personal and UN accounts. French investigative outlet Mediapart first reported that the files suggested Aidan had provided confidential UN material to Epstein. The French Foreign Ministry referred the case to prosecutors and has opened separate administrative and disciplinary proceedings against Aidan. He has denied wrongdoing. His lawyer has called for respect for the presumption of innocence.<\/p>\n

The investigation was formally opened last month. The search on Friday was conducted in the presence of Ariane de Rothschild, the bank\u2019s chief executive, who herself appeared in the Epstein files released by the US Justice Department in January \u2014 showing she maintained a years-long personal correspondence with Epstein before his 2019 arrest. A bank spokesperson said Epstein was a business acquaintance from 2013 to 2019 and that de Rothschild had no knowledge of his conduct. The bank said it is cooperating fully and launched an internal inquiry as soon as suspicions about Aidan emerged. Swiss financial regulator Finma said it considers all reliable information in its supervision and conducts in-depth reviews when integrity of business activities is in doubt.<\/p>\n

The case is being handled by France\u2019s central office for combating corruption and financial and tax offenses. It follows the January release of millions of Epstein-related documents by the US Justice Department \u2014 the release that has been reshaping the case\u2019s fallout in Europe while generating comparatively less institutional accountability in the United States. Former French Culture Minister Jack Lang resigned in February as head of the Arab World Institute after prosecutors opened a preliminary tax fraud investigation following revelations in the same Epstein files.<\/p>\n

The timing of the public confirmation is notable regardless of the search date. The Parquet National Financier chose to confirm the raid publicly on Tuesday, March 24 \u2014 the same day that Iran war coverage was wall-to-wall across global media. In the United States, where the Epstein files implicate American officials, American institutions, and American victims, coverage of the Paris search has been minimal.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf0d TRANSLATOR\u2019S NOTE:<\/strong> The Epstein accountability story continues to have a distinct geographic character. European judicial systems \u2014 French, British, Belgian \u2014 have been more willing to pursue individuals named in the files than US prosecutors have been. The Aidan case is specifically notable because the alleged offence is not financial in the conventional sense: it involves the alleged transfer of classified UN Security Council intelligence to a convicted sex offender. That is an intelligence and diplomatic scandal layered inside the Epstein case, and it is being treated as such by French authorities. The investigation is being followed in French press \u2014 Le Monde confirmed the raid citing the Parquet National Financier statement, and AFP broke the story \u2014 but has received minimal traction in American media this week.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 WHAT AMERICAN READERS NEED TO KNOW:<\/strong> A former French UN diplomat allegedly fed classified UN Security Council briefings to Jeffrey Epstein for years while serving as an official. French authorities searched a private bank\u2019s Paris offices in connection with the case last Friday. The bank\u2019s own CEO appeared in the Epstein files. The US Justice Department released the documents that made this investigation possible. The accountability proceedings are happening in France. They are not happening here.<\/p>\n

Sources: Reuters (international wire \u2014 raid confirmed, Aidan identified, UN document transfer, bank cooperation); AP (international wire \u2014 Parquet National Financier statement, Friday search, investigation opened last month); Bloomberg (international wire \u2014 Aidan focus, passive corruption charges, Ariane de Rothschild present); AFP\/Daily Sabah (international wire \u2014 investigation referral from French Foreign Ministry, Mediapart reporting); ABC News (US \u2014 AP wire, French financial prosecutor confirmation); Jerusalem Post (Israel, independent \u2014 Reuters wire, Ariane de Rothschild Epstein correspondence); Parquet National Financier statement (primary \u2014 charges, scope of investigation)<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

WATCH LIST \u2014 UPDATED DAY 26 MORNING<\/strong>
\ud83d\udd34 FIVE-DAY DIPLOMATIC WINDOW \u2014 Day 3 of 5. Pakistan talks still possible but unconfirmed. Iran not publicly participating. Military rejection total. Diplomatic track quietly open. 72 hours remaining.
\ud83d\udd34 Islamabad talks \u2014 No confirmed date. Two formats under discussion (Araghchi\/Witkoff\/Kushner; Vance\/Ghalibaf). Iran not confirmed. Israel not part of talks and still striking.
\ud83d\udd34 Iraq PMF retaliation \u2014 National Security Council authorized response \u201cwith all available means.\u201d Kataib Hezbollah\u2019s 5-day embassy pause under severe pressure. 300+ attacks on US positions in Iraq since Feb 28. Anbar strike deadliest single US strike in Iraq since war began.
\ud83d\udd34 Russia Spring Offensive \u2014 ISW confirmed. 948 drones in 24 hours. UNESCO site burning. Maternity hospital struck. Zelenskyy explicitly connecting Russia and Iran. Ukraine missile deficit growing.
\ud83d\udd34 Lebanon ground invasion \u2014 Israel declared intent to control south Lebanon to Litani River. Lebanese officials warn invasion imminent. 1,039+ killed, 1 million+ displaced.
\ud83d\udd34 Hormuz practical reopening \u2014 IMO letter issued, one Thai tanker transited. Insurance still unavailable. 5 vessels\/day vs 120 pre-war. Iran maintaining toll and coordination requirements.
\ud83d\udd34 Mojtaba Khamenei \u2014 Still silent publicly. Zolghadr appointment confirms his personal control of security apparatus. His position on any deal is unknown and determinative.
\ud83d\udfe1 15-point plan \u2014 Iran military rejected. Diplomatic track open. Key gap: plan requires proxy abandonment and full nuclear dismantlement. Iran\u2019s counter-demands include reparations and sovereignty guarantees. Israel not signed on.
\ud83d\udfe1 Iran toughening stance? \u2014 Iran International reports some Iranian officials increasingly wary that negotiations could expose senior leadership to accountability. Incentive to delay may be growing.
\ud83d\udfe1 Edmond de Rothschild raid \u2014 French investigation into former employee\u2019s alleged transfer of classified UN documents to Epstein. Bank CEO appeared in Epstein files. Watch for additional European judicial actions.
\ud83d\udfe1 Insider trading investigation \u2014 SEC still silent. Congress moving on legislation. Pre-announcement oil futures pattern still unaddressed.
\ud83d\udfe1 82nd Airborne deployment \u2014 Fewer than 1,500 troops, orders written, movement imminent. Kharg Island occupation still under White House consideration.
\ud83d\udfe1 Primorsk\/Ust-Luga \u2014 Operations suspended after Ukrainian strikes. Shadow fleet hub disrupted. Russia\u2019s Baltic oil export capacity significantly degraded.
\ud83d\udfe1 Gaza \u201cceasefire\u201d \u2014 Holding. West Bank settler violence at 10 attacks per day (Yesh Din). Aid at 200 trucks\/day vs 600 needed.
\ud83d\udfe1 Trump approval \u2014 36%, lowest of second term (Reuters\/Ipsos). Cost of living and war disapproval driving decline.<\/p>\n

=================================================================<\/p>\n

ROTWR DAY 26 MORNING \u2014 SOURCE CHEATSHEET<\/p>\n

Story 1 \u2014 The 15 Points And What Iran Agreed To Before The War<\/p>\n

– NYT (15-point plan, Pakistani delivery): https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2026\/03\/24\/world\/middleeast\/iran-us-deal-15-points.html<\/a><\/p>\n

– WSJ (plan contents, nuclear sites): https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/world\/middle-east\/us-iran-ceasefire-plan-15-points-nuclear-missiles-hormuz<\/a><\/p>\n

– Bloomberg (15-point plan confirmation): https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2026-03-25\/us-drafts-15-point-plan-to-end-iran-war-as-trump-pushes-talks<\/a><\/p>\n

– Haaretz (Iran “considering,” disputed points): https:\/\/www.haaretz.com\/middle-east-news\/2026-03-25\/ty-article\/.premium\/middle-east-source-u-s-presented-15-point-proposal-to-iran-via-pakistan\/0000019d-2198-d640-a5fd-e79eee360003<\/a><\/p>\n

– ABC News (plan confirmed, ballistic\/nuclear\/Hormuz): https:\/\/abcnews.com\/International\/live-updates\/iran-live-updates-trumps-48-hour-deadline-expire\/?id=131316431<\/a><\/p>\n

– Jerusalem Post (Israel concerns, “framework”): https:\/\/www.jpost.com\/middle-east\/iran-news\/article-891095<\/a><\/p>\n

– RTE (Zolfaghari rejection, “not now not ever”): https:\/\/www.rte.ie\/news\/middle-east\/2026\/0325\/1565076-iran-conflict\/<\/p>\n

– France 24 (pre-war overlap, Al-Busaidi statements): https:\/\/www.france24.com\/en\/middle-east\/20260325-us-proposes-15-point-plan-as-iran-opens-hormuz-to-non-hostile-oil-vessels<\/a><\/p>\n

– Wikipedia \u2014 2025-2026 Iran-US negotiations (Oman breakthrough Feb 27, Al-Busaidi “undermined”): https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/2025%E2%80%932026_Iran%E2%80%93United_States_negotiations<\/a><\/p>\n

– Al Jazeera (Iran diplomatic calls, ambassador statement): https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/news\/2026\/3\/25\/us-talking-to-itself-says-iran-as-trump-claims-wheels-of-diplomacy-turning<\/a><\/p>\n

Story 2 \u2014 Hormuz On Iran’s Terms<\/p>\n

– Al Jazeera (IMO letter text, non-hostile vessels): https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/economy\/2026\/3\/25\/iran-says-non-hostile-ships-can-pass-safely-through-strait-of-hormuz<\/a><\/p>\n

– Bloomberg (IMO letter dated March 22): https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2026-03-24\/iran-says-non-hostile-ships-can-cross-hormuz-on-its-terms<\/a><\/p>\n

– Lloyd’s List (toll confirmed, Selen turned back, Larak corridor): https:\/\/www.lloydslist.com\/LL1156689\/Chinese-boxship-pays-Iran-for-Hormuz-passage-as-corridor-traffic-grows<\/a><\/p>\n

– Times of Israel (IMO communique text): https:\/\/www.timesofisrael.com\/liveblog_entry\/iran-to-allow-non-hostile-vessels-to-transit-strait-of-hormuz-statement-to-maritime-organization\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– ITV (Brent below $100 overnight): https:\/\/www.itv.com\/news\/2026-03-25\/us-issues-15-point-ceasefire-plan-but-iran-still-insists-they-are-not-in-talks<\/a><\/p>\n

– The Maritime Executive (practical reopening minimal, insurance unavailable): https:\/\/maritime-executive.com\/article\/ukraine-attacks-russia-s-baltic-oil-terminals-and-starts-fire-at-primorsk<\/a><\/p>\n

– Bangchak statement (Thai tanker transit): https:\/\/www.bangchak.co.th\/en\/news\/<\/p>\n

Story 3 \u2014 Iraq: The Third Front<\/p>\n

– Reuters\/Al Arabiya (15 killed, 30 killed\/wounded, security meeting): https:\/\/english.alarabiya.net\/News\/middle-east\/2026\/03\/24\/airstrikes-on-iraq-s-pmf-site-kill-15-including-anbar-commander<\/a><\/p>\n

– Al Jazeera (Iraq summons envoys, NSC authorization): https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/news\/2026\/3\/24\/iraq-to-summon-us-iranian-envoys-over-deadly-attacks-pms-office<\/a><\/p>\n

– The National (NSC decision, Peshmerga deaths, all available means): https:\/\/www.thenationalnews.com\/news\/mena\/2026\/03\/25\/iraq-allows-pmf-to-respond-to-attacks-after-deadly-strike\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– Jerusalem Post (30 killed\/wounded, Habbaniyah, Dawai deputy also killed): https:\/\/www.jpost.com\/middle-east\/article-891019<\/a><\/p>\n

– Soufan Center analysis (Iraq unable to avoid crossfire, historical cycle): https:\/\/thesoufancenter.org\/intelbrief-2026-march-16\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– Eurasia Review (Iraq inches closer to war, PMF authorized): https:\/\/www.eurasiareview.com\/25032026-iraq-inches-closer-to-entering-war-authorizes-pmf-to-retaliate-after-us-israeli-strikes-kill-fighters-in-anbar\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– Kurdistan Peshmerga Ministry statement (6 killed, 30 wounded): via The National above<\/p>\n

Story 4 \u2014 Russia\/Ukraine<\/p>\n

– Al Jazeera (948 drones, spring offensive): https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/news\/2026\/3\/24\/russia-hits-ukraine-with-deadly-daytime-barrage-as-spring-offensive-starts<\/a><\/p>\n

– Euronews (total casualties, 11 regions, Ivano-Frankivsk): https:\/\/www.euronews.com\/2026\/03\/24\/almost-1000-drones-within-24-hours-russia-launched-one-of-its-largest-attacks-on-ukraine<\/a><\/p>\n

– CNN (daytime wave, maternity hospital, Lviv UNESCO, victims): https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2026\/03\/24\/europe\/russia-ukraine-rare-daytime-drone-attack-intl<\/a><\/p>\n

– Ukrainska Pravda (Zelenskyy “Russia helping Iranian regime”): https:\/\/www.pravda.com.ua\/eng\/news\/2026\/03\/24\/8027018\/<\/p>\n

– Kyiv Post\/Kyiv Independent (Primorsk strike, Ufa refinery): https:\/\/kyivindependent.com\/mass-drone-attack-strikes-across-russia-fire-breaks-out-at-major-oil-port\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– Moscow Times (Primorsk confirmed, Ust-Luga suspended): https:\/\/www.themoscowtimes.com\/2026\/03\/23\/ukraine-strikes-primorsk-port-in-northwestern-russia-damaging-fuel-reservoirs-a92302<\/a><\/p>\n

– ISW assessment (spring offensive confirmed, via Kyiv Post): https:\/\/www.kyivpost.com\/post\/72461<\/a><\/p>\n

Story 5 \u2014 The Plan Iran Rejected<\/p>\n

– RTE (Zolfaghari quotes, “not now not ever”): https:\/\/www.rte.ie\/news\/middle-east\/2026\/0325\/1565076-iran-conflict\/<\/p>\n

– EA WorldView (Iran rejects 15-point plan): https:\/\/eaworldview.com\/2026\/03\/us-israel-war-trump-iran-rejects-15-point-plan\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– CGTN (Iran demands reparations \u2014 note: Chinese state media): https:\/\/news.cgtn.com\/news\/2026-03-25\/US-sends-Iran-15-point-ceasefire-plan-as-Tehran-demands-reparations-1LNj7NmCRoc\/p.html<\/a><\/p>\n

– Iran International (fracturing Iranian regime, wary of exposure \u2014 note: Iran opposition outlet): https:\/\/www.iranintl.com\/en\/202603247615<\/a><\/p>\n

– Newsweek (Ghalibaf denial, “fake news”): https:\/\/www.newsweek.com\/iran-war-live-update-power-plant-strikes-warning-trump-deadline-11718848<\/a><\/p>\n

– Al Jazeera (Araghchi calls, “cloud of mistrust”): https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/news\/2026\/3\/25\/us-talking-to-itself-says-iran-as-trump-claims-wheels-of-diplomacy-turning<\/a><\/p>\n

– Bloomberg (IMO letter dated March 22, predates Truth Social): https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2026-03-24\/iran-says-non-hostile-ships-can-cross-hormuz-on-its-terms<\/a><\/p>\n

Story 6 \u2014 Edmond de Rothschild \/ Epstein<\/p>\n

– Reuters (raid confirmed, Aidan identified, UN document transfer, bank cooperation): https:\/\/www.dailymaverick.co.za\/article\/2026-03-24-edmond-de-rothschild-paris-offices-raided-in-epstein-linked-probe-into-diplomat\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– AP\/ABC News (Parquet National Financier statement, Friday search, investigation opened last month): https:\/\/abcnews.com\/International\/wireStory\/french-authorities-search-paris-arm-swiss-bank-edmond-131363124<\/a><\/p>\n

– Bloomberg (Aidan focus, passive corruption charges, Ariane de Rothschild present): https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2026-03-24\/edmond-de-rothschild-searched-over-ex-staffer-s-epstein-ties<\/a><\/p>\n

– AFP\/Daily Sabah (referral from French Foreign Ministry, Mediapart reporting): https:\/\/www.dailysabah.com\/business\/finance\/french-prosecutors-raid-rothschild-bank-in-epstein-linked-probe<\/a><\/p>\n

– Jerusalem Post (Ariane de Rothschild Epstein correspondence): https:\/\/www.jpost.com\/international\/article-891080<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Day 26 | Iran War & Beyond Weekday morning and evening editions. Saturdays once. Sundays once. All sources labeled. Translator notes on every story. WAR DAY 26 | NUMBERS AT PUBLICATION \ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddf7 Iran: 1,500+ killed (Health Ministry \u2014 FROZEN since ~Day 7). HRANA: 3,200+ including 214+ children. 82,000+ civilian structures damaged or destroyed (Iranian Red […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_oxygen_hide_in_design_set":false,"_oxygen_tags":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[143],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-433","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-patreon"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=433"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=433"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=433"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=433"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}