{"id":447,"date":"2026-04-01T11:39:34","date_gmt":"2026-04-01T11:39:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/2026\/04\/01\/the-rest-of-the-world-report-wednesday-april-1-2026-morning-edition\/"},"modified":"2026-04-01T11:39:34","modified_gmt":"2026-04-01T11:39:34","slug":"the-rest-of-the-world-report-wednesday-april-1-2026-morning-edition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/2026\/04\/01\/the-rest-of-the-world-report-wednesday-april-1-2026-morning-edition\/","title":{"rendered":"The Rest of the World Report | Wednesday, April 1, 2026 \u2014 Morning Edition"},"content":{"rendered":"

Day 33 | Iran War & Beyond<\/h3>\n
<\/div>\n

Weekday morning and evening editions. Saturdays once. Sundays once. All sources labeled. Translator notes on every story.<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

WAR DAY 33 | NUMBERS AT PUBLICATION<\/strong>
\ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddf7 Iran: 1,937 killed, 24,800+ wounded (Iran Deputy Health Ministry \u2014 last official update). HRANA independent estimate: 3,200+. Iran International: 4,700+ security forces killed. Iranian Red Crescent: 93,000+ civilian housing units damaged.
\ud83c\uddf1\ud83c\udde7 Lebanon: 1,247+ killed, 3,543+ wounded (Lebanon Health Ministry, updated March 31). 1 million+ displaced. \ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddf1 Israel: 19 civilians killed by Iranian missile strikes. 6,130+ wounded. 20+ total killed by Iranian fire.
\ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddf6 Iraq: 96+ killed (CNN tally).
\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 US: 13 KIA. 348 wounded, 6 seriously (US Central Command, updated April 1).
\ud83d\udee2\ufe0f Brent crude: $103.26 (April 1 morning \u2014 pulling back from Tuesday\u2019s $118.35 close on Trump \u201c2-3 weeks\u201d withdrawal comments. AP: Brent still up more than 40% since the war began.)
\ud83d\udcb0 Dow: 46,341 (Tuesday close \u2014 market reopens this morning).
\ud83d\udcb0 US gas: $4.018\/gallon (AAA, Tuesday \u2014 first above $4 since 2022).
\ud83c\udf10 Iran internet blackout: 700+ hours (NetBlocks, estimated \u2014 Day 33).<\/p>\n

\n

1. PASSOVER EVE UNDER FIRE \u2014 IRAN\u2019S THREE WAVES IN ONE HOUR<\/h3>\n

At dawn on Wednesday, the IRGC fired three waves of ballistic missiles at Israel within a single hour. The timing was not incidental. Wednesday evening is the start of Passover \u2014 the most heavily travelled night of the Jewish calendar, when families across Israel drive to holiday dinners and Jewish communities around the world gather for the Seder. The roads were already filling when the sirens went off.<\/p>\n

A cluster munition struck Bnei Brak, a densely populated ultra-Orthodox city in the Tel Aviv metropolitan area. Fourteen people were wounded in Bnei Brak alone. Among them: a critically injured girl \u2014 sources give her age as 10 or 12 across different outlets \u2014 who was hit by glass from a shattered window while she was in bed, her father in moderate condition at Sheba Medical Center, where doctors are fighting for the girl\u2019s life. A 13-year-old boy and a 36-year-old woman were moderately wounded. Six children total underwent medical evaluation. A woman and her son were admitted to Rabin Medical Center \u2014 the child, in serious condition, was transferred to Schneider Children\u2019s Medical Center. In Tel Aviv and across the central and northern districts, sirens sent residents into shelters as fragments scattered across multiple impact points. In all, sixteen people were wounded across the broader Tel Aviv area from the morning\u2019s barrages, Sheba Hospital confirmed to CNN. The IDF intercepted additional missiles throughout the morning \u2014 by mid-morning it had logged four separate attack waves since dawn.<\/p>\n

Overnight and into Wednesday morning, the IDF struck what it described as infrastructure targets in Tehran. CNN geolocated images confirmed thick black smoke near the Sadr Expressway in the capital and fires near Mount Soffeh in Isfahan, where US bombers struck an ammunition depot Tuesday night. The Houthis simultaneously announced a \u201cbarrage of ballistic missiles\u201d at southern Israel, described as a joint operation with Iran and Hezbollah. The IDF intercepted the Houthi projectile. The war on Day 33 has not paused. It has widened.<\/p>\n

Bnei Brak is not a military target. It is one of the most densely settled civilian communities in Israel \u2014 an area of narrow streets, apartment blocks, and synagogues where large families live in close proximity. Cluster munitions, which disperse submunitions across a wide radius, are banned by the Convention on Cluster Munitions, a treaty signed by more than 100 nations. Neither Iran nor Israel has signed it \u2014 both have used cluster munitions in this war, Iran against Israeli civilians and Israel in Lebanon, where the use has been condemned by Amnesty International. This is not the first time Iran has used them against Israeli population centres in this conflict. It is the first time they have landed on Passover eve, while a twelve-year-old girl was asleep in her bed.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf0d TRANSLATOR\u2019S NOTE:<\/strong> The Passover timing is receiving explicit coverage across international press. Ynet, Times of Israel, and wire services all noted the deliberate choice of Passover eve \u2014 the most travelled night of the year \u2014 as the moment for a three-wave barrage. The use of cluster munitions on civilian residential areas is being covered in parallel by international human rights correspondents who have documented Iran\u2019s pattern of cluster munition use since Day 1. The ICRC and Amnesty International have previously condemned Iranian cluster munition strikes in this war as violations of international humanitarian law. The strikes on Bnei Brak on Passover eve will land in that documented pattern.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 WHAT AMERICAN READERS NEED TO KNOW:<\/strong> Iran fired three waves of missiles at Israeli cities this morning, on Passover eve, the busiest travel night of the Jewish year. A 12-year-old girl is fighting for her life in a Tel Aviv hospital. Fourteen people were wounded in Bnei Brak alone. The IRGC used cluster munitions \u2014 weapons banned by international treaty \u2014 on a densely populated civilian neighbourhood. This happened the same morning that Iran\u2019s foreign minister told Al Jazeera the trust level with Washington is at zero. Both things describe the same war.<\/p>\n

Sources: Times of Israel (Israel \u2014 three waves confirmed, fourteen wounded Bnei Brak, 12-year-old girl critical, doctors \u201cfighting for her life,\u201d father moderate, six children evaluated, IDF four attack waves by mid-morning); CNN live (US \u2014 16 wounded across Tel Aviv area, 10-year-old girl critical confirmed Sheba Hospital, CNN geolocated images Tehran and Isfahan fires); Ynet News (Israel \u2014 cluster munition details, 12-year-old girl description confirmed, 13-year-old boy moderate); AP\/Gulf News (wire \u2014 IRGC confirmed three waves within one hour; Houthis joint operation announcement, IDF intercept confirmed); Al Jazeera Day 33 (Qatar, state-funded\/editorially independent \u2014 broader barrage context, Passover timing noted)<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

2. IRAN STRIKES QATAR \u2014 FIRING ON THE HAND THAT FEEDS DIPLOMACY<\/h3>\n

Early Wednesday morning, Iran launched three cruise missiles at Qatar\u2019s northern territorial waters. Qatar\u2019s air defences intercepted two. The third struck the Aqua 1, a fuel oil tanker on charter to QatarEnergy \u2014 the Qatari state energy company. The 21-member crew was evacuated. No injuries were reported. No environmental impact, QatarEnergy confirmed.<\/p>\n

Qatar did not fire back. It issued a statement. The Defence Ministry confirmed the attack matter-of-factly, released the tanker name and crew count, and said nothing further. That restraint is itself a political act. Qatar hosts the largest US military base in the Middle East \u2014 Al Udeid Air Base, home to CENTCOM\u2019s forward headquarters and thousands of US troops. It hosts Al Jazeera, the region\u2019s most watched international Arabic news channel, which has provided much of the world\u2019s primary coverage of this war. It has been one of the primary diplomatic intermediaries between Washington and Tehran, facilitating message exchanges and hosting the indirect communications that both sides acknowledge are ongoing. And Iran has now struck a tanker flying Qatar\u2019s state energy company\u2019s name in Qatari territorial waters.<\/p>\n

This is Iran firing on a country that is simultaneously hosting the US military and attempting to end a war Iran is fighting against the US. The message is not subtle. Iran struck Qatar\u2019s energy infrastructure directly on the same morning its foreign minister told Al Jazeera that the trust level with Washington is \u201cat zero.\u201d Kuwait\u2019s airport separately sustained a drone strike Wednesday morning \u2014 a fuel tank hit at Kuwait International Airport, sparking what KUNA described as \u201ca large fire\u201d that crews worked to contain. In Bahrain, air raid sirens sounded twice. Saudi Arabia intercepted two more Iranian drones. In the UAE, a person was killed in Fujairah by debris from an intercepted drone \u2014 the first confirmed death in the Emirates in several days.<\/p>\n

There is a dimension to Iran\u2019s Gulf targeting that is rarely stated plainly in American coverage. Iran is not simply retaliating against countries that host US bases. It is also hitting countries that are, by multiple credible accounts, privately pushing for the war to continue. Reuters reported that Gulf states \u201cdid not ask the US to go to war with Iran, but many are now urging it not to stop short.\u201d The Times of Israel, citing multiple Gulf officials, reported that the UAE and Saudi Arabia are pushing Washington to comprehensively degrade Iran\u2019s military capacity \u2014 with one official calling an early end to the war with Iran still armed \u201ca strategic disaster.\u201d The New York Times reported Saudi Arabia was pressing the US to continue operations as recently as March 24. Iran calculated that striking the Gulf would pressure those governments toward demanding a ceasefire. According to analysts and Gulf officials cited by Reuters and the Times of Israel, the attacks appear to have produced the opposite effect: hardening Gulf resolve that Iran must be permanently weakened before any settlement. Iran is now hitting countries that are absorbing its missiles and privately asking Washington to keep going. Both of those things are simultaneously true.<\/p>\n

Iran has now attacked all six GCC countries \u2014 Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE \u2014 and struck them again today. The Gulf states are not simple bystanders. They are bystanders with US bases on their soil, strategic interests in the war\u2019s outcome, and private positions on its continuation that do not always match their public calls for peace.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf0d TRANSLATOR\u2019S NOTE:<\/strong> The strike on a QatarEnergy tanker is being covered as a significant escalation in Gulf media \u2014 Arab News, The National, and Gulf News all led with the Qatar attack specifically, not simply as part of the broader daily toll. The significance is structural: Qatar has been the most diplomatically active Gulf state in attempting to facilitate an end to this war, and Iran has now struck its state energy company\u2019s vessel in its own territorial waters. The dimension that international coverage is increasingly examining \u2014 and that American media has largely left unexplored \u2014 is the split within the GCC itself. The Times of Israel, Reuters, and multiple Gulf analysts have documented that UAE and Saudi Arabia are privately pushing Washington to continue the war and permanently degrade Iran, while Qatar, Kuwait, and Oman are pushing for a swift end. Iran\u2019s targeting strategy \u2014 83% of its missile and drone attacks directed at Gulf states versus 17% at Israel, per ACLED \u2014 reflects Tehran\u2019s calculation that punishing the Gulf would pressure it toward demanding a ceasefire. The evidence so far suggests Iran has misread the room: the attacks appear to be hardening the UAE and Saudi position, not softening it.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 WHAT AMERICAN READERS NEED TO KNOW:<\/strong> Iran struck a Qatari state energy tanker in Qatari waters this morning. Qatar hosts the largest US base in the Middle East and has been one of the primary diplomatic channels for ending this war. Kuwait\u2019s airport is on fire. A person was killed in the UAE. Iran has attacked all six Gulf states \u2014 but the Gulf is not a unified bloc. Qatar and Oman want this war to end quickly. The UAE and Saudi Arabia are privately telling Washington to keep going until Iran is permanently degraded. Iran is attacking all of them anyway \u2014 and in doing so, may be ensuring the war continues longer than it would if the Gulf states had simply stayed quiet.<\/p>\n

Sources: AP (wire \u2014 QatarEnergy Aqua 1 tanker confirmed struck, three missiles launched, two intercepted, 21-crew evacuated, no casualties, no environmental impact); QatarEnergy statement via Outlook India (primary source \u2014 tanker name Aqua 1, Qatar northern territorial waters confirmed); AP\/KUNA (wire \u2014 Kuwait airport drone strike, fuel tank hit, \u201clarge fire\u201d confirmed, state-run KUNA); AP (wire \u2014 Bahrain two alerts, UAE Fujairah one killed by intercepted drone debris, Saudi Arabia two drones intercepted); Times of Israel (Israel \u2014 Gulf officials on record: ending war with Iran still armed \u201ca strategic disaster,\u201d UAE and Saudi pushing for continued degradation); Reuters via Ya Libnan (wire \u2014 \u201cGulf states did not ask the US to go to war with Iran, but many are now urging it not to stop short,\u201d UAE\/Saudi vs Qatar\/Oman\/Kuwait split confirmed); Responsible Statecraft (US analysis \u2014 NYT cited, Saudi Arabia pushing US to continue war March 24; ACLED 83%\/17% GCC-versus-Israel targeting ratio); Al Jazeera Day 33 (Qatar, state-funded\/editorially independent \u2014 all six GCC states attacked, broader Gulf context)<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

3. \u201cTHE TRUST LEVEL IS AT ZERO\u201d \u2014 THE MORNING AFTER THE FIVE-POINT PLAN<\/h3>\n

Less than 24 hours after markets rallied 1,125 Dow points on diplomatic optimism, Iran\u2019s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told Al Jazeera precisely what Tehran thinks of the peace process. \u201cWe do not have any faith that negotiations with the U.S. will yield any results,\u201d he said. \u201cThe trust level is at zero.\u201d<\/p>\n

He confirmed, again, that he is receiving direct messages from US envoy Steve Witkoff. He confirmed, again, that this does not constitute negotiations. \u201cYou cannot speak to the people of Iran in the language of threats and deadlines,\u201d he said. Asked about a US ground offensive, his answer was a dare: \u201cWe are waiting for them. We know very well how to defend ourselves. In a ground war, we can do it even better.\u201d<\/p>\n

On the same morning, Trump told reporters the war could end in two to three weeks \u2014 and does not require a deal to do so. He said he would walk away once he felt confident Iran could not quickly build a nuclear weapon, \u201ceven if Tehran does not agree to a ceasefire.\u201d That framing, confirmed by AP, introduces a scenario the Gulf states and Israel had not publicly planned for: a US withdrawal that leaves Hormuz closed, Iran still firing at Gulf neighbours, and no agreement binding anyone to anything. The Wall Street Journal reported Trump is prepared to end the campaign even if the Iranian regime remains standing and capable of attacking its neighbours. For Israel and the Gulf states, the WSJ noted pointedly, in that scenario the war would not be over.<\/p>\n

Hegseth captured the posture more bluntly than anyone. The US, he said at Tuesday\u2019s briefing, is \u201cnegotiating with bombs.\u201d Three words that explain everything about why Araghchi\u2019s trust level is at zero.<\/p>\n

The China-Pakistan five-point plan remains on the table. A vote on the revised Bahrain UNSC Hormuz resolution is tentatively set for Thursday. Trump\u2019s April 6 deadline \u2014 five days away \u2014 has not been withdrawn. Iran is still firing. Diplomacy is still being conducted. None of these things are contradictory. They are all happening simultaneously.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf0d TRANSLATOR\u2019S NOTE:<\/strong> Araghchi\u2019s \u201ctrust level is at zero\u201d quote is leading international coverage this morning \u2014 AP distributed it widely and it is the top line in Al Jazeera, Gulf News, and multiple Asian outlets. Outside the United States, the question being asked is not whether Iran will accept a deal \u2014 it is whether the US has a coherent end-state in mind at all. Analyst Trita Parsi told Al Jazeera it is \u201cnot as easy for Trump to just walk out\u201d of the conflict as the president\u2019s rhetoric suggests \u2014 Iran will continue to control Hormuz and continue attacking Gulf shipping regardless of whether US forces are present or not. The five-point plan is still being discussed in diplomatic circles, but the gap between Tuesday\u2019s market optimism and Wednesday morning\u2019s military and diplomatic reality is the story international press is leading with.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 WHAT AMERICAN READERS NEED TO KNOW:<\/strong> Iran\u2019s FM said the trust level with Washington is at zero this morning. Trump said the war could end in two to three weeks without a deal. Hegseth said the US is \u201cnegotiating with bombs.\u201d Tuesday\u2019s market rally was built on diplomatic hope. Wednesday morning\u2019s reality is three waves of missiles over Israeli cities, a burning airport in Kuwait, and a tanker on fire off Qatar. The five-point plan exists. The April 6 deadline exists. The gap between them and this morning is significant.<\/p>\n

Sources: AP (wire \u2014 Araghchi \u201ctrust level is at zero\u201d confirmed, direct Witkoff messages confirmed, \u201cwaiting for them\u201d ground war quote, Trump \u201ctwo to three weeks\u201d without deal confirmed); Al Jazeera Day 33 (Qatar, state-funded\/editorially independent \u2014 Araghchi full interview, Trita Parsi analysis); Wall Street Journal via Times of Israel (US \u2014 Trump prepared to end campaign without regime removal, \u201cwar would not be over\u201d for Israel and Gulf if US withdraws); Hegseth via Army Times (US \u2014 \u201cnegotiating with bombs\u201d Pentagon briefing quote)<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

4. TWENTY-TWO NATIONS SIGNED. NOBODY SENT A SHIP.<\/h3>\n

On February 28, the United States and Israel launched a war that closed the Strait of Hormuz. No allied government was consulted beforehand. No allied government was notified. European leaders found out when the bombs fell. That is the origin point of a diplomatic crisis that is now, on Day 33, producing one of the most significant \u2014 and least covered \u2014 fractures in the Western alliance since the war began.<\/p>\n

Having started the war alone, Trump then demanded his allies help clean up its consequences. He publicly called on France, Japan, South Korea, Britain, and all NATO members to send warships to escort tankers through a strait that Iran had closed in retaliation for the strikes. He threatened NATO with a \u201cvery bad future\u201d if they refused. He called holdouts \u201ccowards.\u201d When responses came in, Axios confirmed they ranged from \u201cskepticism to hell no.\u201d Germany\u2019s Defence Minister Boris Pistorius delivered the line now being repeated in parliaments across Europe: \u201cWhat does Trump expect a handful or two handfuls of European frigates to do in the Strait of Hormuz that the powerful US Navy cannot do? This is not our war; we have not started it.\u201d EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas was equally direct: \u201cThis is not Europe\u2019s war, but Europe\u2019s interests are directly at stake.\u201d Australia said explicitly it would not send a ship. Japan said it had no plans to dispatch naval vessels. France, Germany, and Italy all ruled out military participation. Poland, Sweden, and Spain said the same.<\/p>\n

Then came the statements. On March 19, twenty-two nations \u2014 including the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Canada, South Korea, Australia, the UAE, and Bahrain \u2014 signed a joint declaration expressing readiness to \u201ccontribute to appropriate efforts to ensure safe passage\u201d through Hormuz. It was presented publicly as progress. Behind the scenes, Axios reported the reality: France\u2019s Macron had opposed even the statement and was convinced to drop his objection only after assurances that practical commitments would be left for later. The statement was designed, one source familiar with the process told Axios, as \u201clargely a gesture to placate President Trump.\u201d Axios\u2019s own reality check on the document: it \u201cdoes not include any commitment to send naval vessels or other resources to make that happen.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Soufan Center, reviewing the 22-nation list, confirmed the same: none of the signatories has announced specific contributions to an actual escort operation. Twenty-two signatures. Zero ships.<\/p>\n

The collective view among foreign leaders, multiple officials told the Washington Post and Reuters, is that Trump is attempting to hand them responsibility for a problem he created. The Washington Post: European leaders are \u201creluctant to join a conflict he started without consulting them.\u201d A CNN analysis published this morning captures the core dynamic plainly: \u201cThe president is telling US allies \u2014 who didn\u2019t join his war in Iran because they got no advance notice, didn\u2019t want it and thought it infringed international law \u2014 that they\u2019ll be stuck with the consequences.\u201d Rubio has now reframed the US role entirely. The US, he said, is \u201cprepared to be a part of that plan. We don\u2019t have to lead that plan.\u201d An administration that launched the war unilaterally is now positioning itself as a supporting partner in the cleanup.<\/p>\n

The operational reality underneath the politics is equally stark. Naval News assessed that securing Hormuz by convoy would be a \u201chighly demanding military task\u201d \u2014 warships facing Iranian ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, drones, mines, and fast attack craft operating from a heavily fortified coastline in a 21-mile-wide passage. The Red Sea operation against the Houthis is the closest precedent; it has consumed enormous allied naval resources for months against a far less sophisticated adversary. Even the US Navy is not currently operating inside Hormuz itself \u2014 the strait is considered too dangerous for its own vessels.<\/p>\n

On Wednesday, the Bahrain UNSC draft resolution on Hormuz \u2014 which had originally invoked Chapter VII, the binding UN enforcement mechanism \u2014 was quietly revised to remove that explicit reference. Russia and China, both holding Security Council vetoes and both opposing a binding mandate, forced the retreat. The revised text retains \u201call necessary means\u201d language without binding authority \u2014 authorising willing states to act, but only if any willing states exist. Bahrain\u2019s choice was between a binding resolution that Russia and China would veto, and a voluntary framework that the US\u2019s own allies have so far declined to join. The vote is tentatively set for Thursday. The coalition it would authorise does not yet exist.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf0d TRANSLATOR\u2019S NOTE:<\/strong> This story is receiving serious analytical coverage in European, Asian, and specialist defence press \u2014 and the framing is pointed. The Washington Post, Axios, Al Jazeera, and Naval News have all documented the gap between the statements and the reality. Outside the United States, the sequence is being read as a case study in alliance management failure: a war started without consultation, coalition demands made without the diplomatic groundwork that would make them credible, threats issued when allies declined, and now a retreat to \u201csupporting role\u201d framing once it became clear no coalition was forming. German Defence Minister Pistorius\u2019s quote \u2014 \u201cthis is not our war; we have not started it\u201d \u2014 is being widely circulated internationally as the distillation of the European position. The UNSC Chapter VII retreat is being read through the same lens: Russia and China blocking the legal framework for forced reopening while simultaneously offering the diplomatic framework through the five-point plan. They are playing both sides of the board, and the US\u2019s allies are not filling the gap.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 WHAT AMERICAN READERS NEED TO KNOW:<\/strong> The US started this war without telling its allies. It then demanded they send warships to reopen the strait the war closed. Twenty-two countries signed a statement. None has sent a ship. Several major signatories \u2014 France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Australia \u2014 have publicly said they won\u2019t while the war is active. The binding UN enforcement mechanism for opening Hormuz has been removed from the draft resolution because Russia and China would have vetoed it. The administration is now describing itself as a \u201csupporting role\u201d in a coalition that doesn\u2019t exist. If Trump walks away from this war in two to three weeks as he says, the Strait of Hormuz may remain under Iranian control, with no coalition in place to reopen it, no binding UN mandate to authorise one, and a set of allies who were not consulted before the war and are not willing to clean up after it.<\/p>\n

Sources: AP (wire \u2014 Trump \u201cwe don\u2019t need any help\u201d reversal confirmed; allied refusals documented); Axios (US \u2014 \u201cresponses ranged from skepticism to \u2018hell no\u2019\u201d confirmed; March 19 joint statement \u201clargely a gesture to placate Trump,\u201d Macron opposed statement, practical steps deferred, \u201cno commitment to send naval vessels\u201d \u2014 Axios reality check); Washington Post (US, centre-left \u2014 \u201cEuropean leaders reluctant to join a conflict he started without consulting them\u201d); NBC News (US \u2014 Trump\u2019s coalition reversal one day after \u201cnumerous countries are on their way\u201d confirmed); Al Jazeera (Qatar, state-funded\/editorially independent \u2014 Australia, Japan, Poland, Sweden, Spain no ships confirmed; Kallas \u201cnot Europe\u2019s war\u201d confirmed); The Hill (US \u2014 France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Australia refusals documented); Reuters (wire \u2014 Gulf states pushing for continued war; allied coalition reluctance); Soufan Center (non-partisan security think tank \u2014 none of 22 signatories announced specific contributions); Naval News (specialist \u2014 Hormuz convoy \u201chighly demanding military task,\u201d Iranian coastal defence environment, Red Sea precedent); German Defence Minister Pistorius quote via AP\/Washington Post \u2014 \u201cThis is not our war; we have not started it\u201d; Reuters via Global Banking & Finance (wire \u2014 Bahrain UNSC revised draft, Chapter VII removed, Thursday vote)<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

5. THE FENTANYL FACTORY \u2014 WHAT ISRAEL STRUCK AND WHAT IT MEANS<\/h3>\n

On Tuesday, Israeli forces struck the Tofigh Daru Company, a pharmaceutical manufacturer in Tehran. Both Israel and Iran confirm the strike happened. What it struck \u2014 and what that means \u2014 is where the accounts diverge completely.<\/p>\n

The IDF\u2019s statement was specific: Tofigh Daru was \u201ca principal supplier of fentanyl\u201d to SPND \u2014 Iran\u2019s Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research, the Defence Ministry\u2019s advanced weapons development agency. The factory, the IDF said, \u201cpresented itself as a civilian company\u201d but \u201cin practice transferred to the Iranian terror regime chemical substances, including fentanyl, that were used for research and development of chemical weapons.\u201d Fentanyl, the IDF noted, is an anaesthetic that in high doses is \u201ca highly lethal substance.\u201d The strike, it said, \u201cimpaired the Iranian terror regime\u2019s chemical weapons production capabilities.\u201d<\/p>\n

Iran\u2019s response was immediate and categorical. Araghchi posted a photograph of the factory and wrote: \u201cThe war criminals in Israel are now openly and unashamedly bombing pharmaceutical companies.\u201d The Iranian government said the facility produced \u201canti-cancer, anaesthetic and specialized medicines.\u201d Hospitals do use fentanyl \u2014 extensively, as a surgical anaesthetic and pain management drug. Iran\u2019s position is that this was a legitimate civilian medical facility and its destruction is a war crime.<\/p>\n

The IDF\u2019s claim cannot be independently verified. Iran\u2019s denial cannot be independently verified. What can be independently verified is the pre-existing record of Western concern about exactly this programme. SPND is not a new allegation: the United States sanctioned it in 2014. It was founded by Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, the Iranian nuclear scientist assassinated in 2020. The State Department has cited it repeatedly for chemical weapons research. In July 2025 \u2014 before this war \u2014 the US representative to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons stated that Iran \u201cnow appears to have produced fentanyl-based munitions and other types of weaponized pharmaceutical-based agents.\u201d The Combating Terrorism Center at West Point published a detailed analysis in January 2025 documenting Iran\u2019s development of pharmaceutical-based incapacitating agents, tracing the programme\u2019s origins to Iran\u2019s study of Russia\u2019s use of a fentanyl derivative in the 2002 Moscow theater hostage crisis \u2014 in which around 130 civilians died from the gas. The US has also previously alleged Iran was studying the potential weapons applications of fentanyl in Iranian academic literature.<\/p>\n

The IDF claim is therefore not made in a vacuum. It is made against a documented background of concern, independent of this strike, that SPND has been pursuing weaponised pharmaceutical agents including fentanyl for years. Whether Tofigh Daru specifically was part of that programme is what Israel says and Iran denies. The truth of that specific allegation remains unresolved. The broader programme it references is not.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf0d TRANSLATOR\u2019S NOTE:<\/strong> This story is being covered cautiously by international wire services \u2014 AP distributed both the IDF claim and Iran\u2019s denial in the same report, without adjudication. That is the correct framing. The Jerusalem Post and Israeli media are leading with the IDF characterisation; Al Jazeera and Iranian media are leading with Araghchi\u2019s \u201cbombing pharmaceutical companies\u201d framing. The international audience is receiving both simultaneously. The West Point CTC analysis and State Department OPCW record give the IDF claim a documented foundation that distinguishes this strike from a straightforward targeting of civilian infrastructure. But documented concern about a weapons programme is not the same as confirmed evidence that this specific factory was part of it. Both things are true and should be held simultaneously.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 WHAT AMERICAN READERS NEED TO KNOW:<\/strong> Israel struck a pharmaceutical factory in Tehran on Tuesday and said it was supplying Iran\u2019s weapons development agency with fentanyl for chemical weapons research. Iran said it was a civilian medical facility. Both sides confirmed the strike. The US has been warning about Iran\u2019s fentanyl weapons programme since at least 2014 \u2014 SPND, the agency Israel named, was sanctioned that year. The State Department said in July 2025 that Iran appears to have produced fentanyl-based munitions. The specific claim about this factory is Israel\u2019s. The programme it describes has years of independent Western documentation behind it. Americans are more familiar with fentanyl than almost any population on earth \u2014 they know what a small amount of it does. The idea that it could be weaponised and aerosolized is not hypothetical. It is documented history: Russia used a fentanyl derivative in a Moscow theater in 2002 and killed 130 of the hostages it was trying to save.<\/p>\n

Sources: IDF statement via Jerusalem Post and Israel National News (Israel \u2014 Tofigh Daru Company confirmed, SPND named, fentanyl supply to chemical weapons programme alleged, \u201cpresented itself as a civilian company\u201d quote, \u201cimpaired chemical weapons production\u201d claim); Times of Israel (Israel \u2014 Araghchi photo post, \u201cbombing pharmaceutical companies\u201d quote, both sides confirmed strike Tuesday); AP via KRMG\/Daily Gazette (wire \u2014 both IDF claim and Iran denial carried, fentanyl hospital use noted, US previously alleged Iran experimenting with fentanyl in munitions); Combating Terrorism Center at West Point (non-partisan academic \u2014 January 2025 analysis of Iran\u2019s pharmaceutical-based agent programme, SPND\/fentanyl documentation, 2002 Moscow theater reference); State Department OPCW statement July 2025 via FDD analysis \u2014 \u201cIran now appears to have produced fentanyl-based munitions\u201d (note: FDD is explicitly advocacy-driven and pro-Israel \u2014 State Department statement cited independently)<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

6. FOUR HUMANS ARE GOING TO THE MOON TONIGHT<\/h3>\n

At 6:24 this evening, Eastern Time, a 322-foot rocket will lift off from Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39B in Cape Canaveral, Florida. If it goes \u2014 and the weather forecast gives it an 80% chance \u2014 four people will leave Earth orbit for the first time since December 1972. No human being has travelled beyond low Earth orbit in 53 years. That changes tonight.<\/p>\n

The crew of Artemis II: Commander Reid Wiseman, Pilot Victor Glover, Mission Specialist Christina Koch, and Mission Specialist Jeremy Hansen of the Canadian Space Agency. Their mission is a ten-day free-return trajectory around the Moon aboard the Orion spacecraft \u2014 no landing, but a loop that will carry them approximately 4,700 miles beyond the lunar far side before gravity brings them back to a Pacific Ocean splashdown off San Diego on April 10. They will travel 252,000 miles from Earth. They will see portions of the lunar far side that have never been observed by human eyes.<\/p>\n

The records this crew will set, if they clear the launch tower tonight: Victor Glover will become the first person of colour to travel beyond low Earth orbit. Christina Koch will become the first woman. Jeremy Hansen will become the first non-US citizen to travel to the Moon\u2019s vicinity. Reid Wiseman will become the oldest person to leave low Earth orbit. Four records. Four humans. One rocket. Tonight.<\/p>\n

The countdown is underway. NASA confirmed all systems go as of this morning. The launch window opens at 6:24 PM ET and runs for two hours. Live coverage on NASA\u2019s YouTube channel begins at 7:45 AM for tanking operations; full coverage on NASA+ begins at 12:50 PM.<\/p>\n

Commander Wiseman said it simply when his crew arrived at Kennedy Space Center last week: \u201cHey, let\u2019s go to the moon.\u201d<\/p>\n

The last time humans went this far, Richard Nixon was president, the Vietnam War was still being fought, and the World Trade Center had just opened. Tonight, with three waves of Iranian missiles over Israeli cities at dawn and a burning tanker off Qatar\u2019s coast, four people are going to the Moon. Both of these things are what humanity looks like on April 1, 2026.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf0d TRANSLATOR\u2019S NOTE:<\/strong> Artemis II is receiving enormous international coverage \u2014 CBS News, Live Science, Space.com<\/a>, NASA itself, and international outlets from Canada to Japan are all covering the launch as a major global event. Jeremy Hansen\u2019s inclusion as the first non-US citizen to travel to the Moon\u2019s vicinity is a particular point of pride in Canada and is receiving dedicated coverage there. The contrast with the war \u2014 noted quietly in international coverage without being sensationalised \u2014 is present. The world is watching a rocket and watching missiles simultaneously. Both are news. One of them is about where humanity is capable of going when it tries.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 WHAT AMERICAN READERS NEED TO KNOW:<\/strong> NASA is launching four humans toward the Moon tonight. This is the first crewed mission beyond low Earth orbit since Apollo 17 in December 1972. The launch window opens at 6:24 PM ET. Four records will be set simultaneously if they clear the pad. The mission lasts ten days, with splashdown on April 10. This is not a distraction from the news. It is part of the news \u2014 the part that reminds you what the species is capable of when it points itself in the right direction.<\/p>\n

Sources: NASA (primary source \u2014 Artemis II mission page, countdown confirmed, 6:24 PM ET launch window, all systems go, weather 80% favourable, crew confirmed); CBS News (US \u2014 crew details confirmed, 252,000-mile distance, April 10 splashdown, lunar far side observation detail, Commander Wiseman \u201clet\u2019s go to the moon\u201d quote); Wikipedia\/Artemis II article (compiled records: Glover first person of colour, Koch first woman, Hansen first non-US citizen, all beyond LEO \u2014 sourced to NASA mission overview); Live Science (US \u2014 April 1 launch live coverage, 10-day mission, free-return trajectory confirmed)<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

WATCH LIST \u2014 UPDATED DAY 33 WEDNESDAY MORNING<\/strong>
\ud83d\udd34 PASSOVER EVE MISSILE BARRAGE \u2014 Three IRGC waves in one hour. 16 wounded in Tel Aviv district including two children in critical condition. Cluster munitions on Bnei Brak. IDF continuing to intercept ongoing launches. Watch for casualty updates and further waves.
\ud83d\udd34 QATAR TANKER STRUCK \u2014 Aqua 1 hit in Qatari territorial waters. Crew evacuated. No casualties. Iran fired on the state energy company of a primary diplomatic intermediary. Watch for Qatari response and diplomatic fallout.
\ud83d\udd34 KUWAIT AIRPORT DRONE STRIKE \u2014 Fuel tank hit, large fire. Airport has been closed since February 28. Watch for damage assessment and Gulf response.
\ud83d\udd34 TRUMP PRIME-TIME ADDRESS \u2014 White House confirmed Trump to address the nation Wednesday evening on the Iran war. Watch for what he says about end conditions, Hormuz, and the April 6 deadline.
\ud83d\udd34 APRIL 6 DEADLINE \u2014 Five days. Iran\u2019s FM: trust level at zero. Hormuz still closed. No ceasefire. Watch for whether Trump extends, escalates, or withdraws framing.
\ud83d\udd34 ARAGHCHI \u201cTRUST LEVEL AT ZERO\u201d \u2014 Sharpest statement yet from Tehran\u2019s FM. Ground war dare: \u201cwe are waiting for them.\u201d Watch for any US response.
\ud83d\udd34 ARTEMIS II LAUNCH \u2014 6:24 PM ET tonight. 80% weather. Watch for go\/no-go call at T-2 hours.
\ud83d\udfe1 UNSC HORMUZ VOTE \u2014 Tentatively Thursday. Chapter VII removed. Voluntary coalition language retained. Watch for Russian and Chinese position and whether vote proceeds.
\ud83d\udfe1 FIVE-POINT PLAN STATUS \u2014 Iran has not formally responded. Trump not opposing. Nuclear enrichment gap unaddressed. Watch for any Iranian official statement.
\ud83d\udfe1 TRUMP SPEECH CONTENT \u2014 What he says tonight about end conditions shapes tomorrow\u2019s diplomacy. Watch specifically for any mention of the five-point plan.
\ud83d\udfe1 TOFIGH DARU \/ FENTANYL \u2014 IDF claim specific, Iran denial categorical, independent verification pending. Watch for OPCW response, international chemical weapons community reaction.
\ud83d\udfe1 SHELLY KITTLESON \u2014 American journalist kidnapped Baghdad, Day 32. State Department and FBI coordinating. Watch for release or escalation.
\ud83d\udfe1 BEIRUT \u2014 Seven killed in Wednesday overnight strikes. IDF said it targeted Hezbollah commanders. Watch for Lebanese Health Ministry update.
\ud83d\udfe1 IRAN DECISION-MAKING \u2014 IRGC hardliners driving pace. Araghchi daring US on ground war. Watch for any shift in internal Iranian posture.
\ud83d\udfe1 HOUTHIS ACTIVE \u2014 First joint operation with Iran and Hezbollah confirmed Wednesday. Watch for Bab al-Mandeb escalation.
\ud83d\udfe1 Gaza \u201cceasefire\u201d \u2014 Ongoing. 691+ killed since October.
\ud83d\udfe1 Bushehr \u2014 ~300 Russian specialists remain. Further departures planned.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cWhenever the people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government.\u201d \u2014 Thomas Jefferson, 1789<\/em><\/p>\n

====================================================================<\/p>\n

ROTWR DAY 33 MORNING \u2014 SOURCE CHEATSHEET<\/p>\n

Story 1 \u2014 PASSOVER EVE UNDER FIRE \u2014 IRAN’S THREE WAVES IN ONE HOUR<\/p>\n

– Times of Israel (three waves, Bnei Brak casualties, critical girl, IDF waves): https:\/\/www.timesofisrael.com\/liveblog-april-01-2026\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– CNN live (16 wounded Tel Aviv area, Sheba Hospital, geolocated Tehran\/Isfahan fires): https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2026\/04\/01\/world\/live-news\/iran-war-us-trump-oil<\/a><\/p>\n

– Ynet News (cluster munition details, girl description, 13-year-old boy): https:\/\/www.ynetnews.com\/article\/rjp86m5jze<\/a><\/p>\n

– AP\/Gulf News (IRGC three waves confirmed, Houthis joint operation, IDF intercept): https:\/\/gulfnews.com\/world\/mena\/usisrael-war-on-iran-day-33-trump-says-conflict-could-end-in-two-weeks-maybe-three-kuwait-airport-hit-by-drone-attacks-1.500492706<\/a><\/p>\n

– Al Jazeera Day 33 (broader barrage context, Passover timing): https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/news\/2026\/4\/1\/iran-war-what-is-happening-on-day-33-of-us-israel-attacks<\/a><\/p>\n

Story 2 \u2014 IRAN STRIKES QATAR \u2014 FIRING ON THE HAND THAT FEEDS DIPLOMACY<\/p>\n

– AP wire (Aqua 1 tanker struck, three missiles, two intercepted, 21-crew evacuated): https:\/\/www.wsls.com\/news\/world\/2026\/04\/01\/iran-hits-tanker-off-coast-of-qatar-kuwait-airport-and-israel-kills-5-in-beirut-attack\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– QatarEnergy statement via Outlook India (Aqua 1 confirmed, Qatar territorial waters): https:\/\/www.outlookindia.com\/international\/israel-iran-war-live-updates-1april-us-middle-east-tension-news<\/a><\/p>\n

– AP\/KUNA (Kuwait airport drone strike, large fire): https:\/\/www.union-bulletin.com\/news\/world\/iran-hits-tanker-off-coast-of-qatar-kuwait-airport-and-israel-kills-5-in-beirut\/article_f4f543b0-7e2f-5788-a989-de8dfdbfa4b5.html<\/a><\/p>\n

– Times of Israel (Gulf officials on record: “strategic disaster,” UAE\/Saudi pushing for degradation): https:\/\/www.timesofisrael.com\/gulf-states-opposed-war-with-iran-some-are-now-pushing-to-keep-the-fight-going\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– Reuters via Ya Libnan (“urging it not to stop short,” UAE\/Saudi vs Qatar\/Oman\/Kuwait split): https:\/\/yalibnan.com\/2026\/03\/27\/gulf-arab-states-tell-us-ending-the-war-is-not-enough-irans-capabilities-must-be-degraded\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– Responsible Statecraft (NYT cited, Saudi pushing US March 24; ACLED 83%\/17% ratio): https:\/\/responsiblestatecraft.org\/saudi-arabia-war-iran\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– Al Jazeera Day 33 (all six GCC states attacked): https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/news\/2026\/4\/1\/iran-war-what-is-happening-on-day-33-of-us-israel-attacks<\/a><\/p>\n

Story 3 \u2014 “THE TRUST LEVEL IS AT ZERO” \u2014 THE MORNING AFTER THE FIVE-POINT PLAN<\/p>\n

– AP (Araghchi “trust level is at zero,” Witkoff messages, “waiting for them,” Trump 2-3 weeks no deal): https:\/\/www.wsls.com\/news\/world\/2026\/04\/01\/iran-hits-tanker-off-coast-of-qatar-kuwait-airport-and-israel-kills-5-in-beirut-attack\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– Al Jazeera Day 33 (Araghchi full interview, Trita Parsi analysis): https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/news\/2026\/4\/1\/iran-war-what-is-happening-on-day-33-of-us-israel-attacks<\/a><\/p>\n

– Wall Street Journal via Times of Israel (Trump prepared to end without regime removal, “war would not be over”): https:\/\/www.timesofisrael.com\/liveblog-april-01-2026\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– Army Times (Hegseth “negotiating with bombs”): https:\/\/www.armytimes.com\/news\/pentagon-congress\/2026\/03\/31\/hegseth-reveals-secret-trip-to-middle-east-amid-escalating-iran-war\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Story 4 \u2014 TWENTY-TWO NATIONS SIGNED. NOBODY SENT A SHIP.<\/p>\n

– Axios (March 17 \u2014 “hell no” responses confirmed): https:\/\/www.axios.com\/2026\/03\/17\/strait-hormuz-iran-blockade-oil-trump-coalition<\/a><\/p>\n

– Axios (March 19 \u2014 “largely a gesture to placate Trump,” Macron opposed, no naval commitment): https:\/\/www.axios.com\/2026\/03\/19\/strait-hormuz-coalition-allies-statement-uk<\/a><\/p>\n

– Washington Post (“reluctant to join a conflict he started without consulting them”): https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/politics\/2026\/03\/17\/trump-allies-frustration-military-aid-iran\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– NBC News (Trump “we don’t need any help” reversal): https:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/politics\/donald-trump\/rebuffed-allies-trump-help-defending-strait-hormuz-rcna263917<\/a><\/p>\n

– CNN Politics (allies believe Trump “looking to saddle them with a problem,” Rubio “supporting role”): https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2026\/03\/31\/politics\/strait-of-hormuz-open-trump<\/a><\/p>\n

– CNN analysis April 1 (“stuck with the consequences”): https:\/\/edition.cnn.com\/2026\/04\/01\/politics\/trump-iran-strait-of-hormuz-nato-allies-analysis<\/a><\/p>\n

– Al Jazeera (Australia\/Japan\/Poland\/Sweden\/Spain no ships; Kallas “not Europe’s war”): https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/news\/2026\/3\/16\/trump-says-hormuz-strait-help-on-the-way-as-allies-reject-military-action<\/a><\/p>\n

– The Hill (France\/Germany\/Japan\/South Korea\/Australia refusals): https:\/\/thehill.com\/opinion\/international\/5792528-trump-allies-strait-of-hormuz\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– Soufan Center (none of 22 signatories announced specific contributions): https:\/\/thesoufancenter.org\/intelbrief-2026-march-23\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– Naval News (“highly demanding military task,” Iranian coastal defences): https:\/\/www.navalnews.com\/naval-news\/2026\/03\/the-challenges-of-securing-hormuz-as-6-nations-issue-joint-statement\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– Reuters\/Global Banking & Finance (Bahrain UNSC revised draft, Chapter VII removed): https:\/\/www.globalbankingandfinance.com\/bahrain-circulates-revised-un-hormuz-draft-drops-binding\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Story 5 \u2014 THE FENTANYL FACTORY \u2014 WHAT ISRAEL STRUCK AND WHAT IT MEANS<\/p>\n

– Jerusalem Post (IDF statement, Tofigh Daru, SPND named, fentanyl chemical weapons claim): http:\/\/www.jpost.com\/middle-east\/iran-news\/article-891860<\/a><\/p>\n

– Israel National News (IDF full statement, “presented itself as civilian company”): https:\/\/www.israelnationalnews.com\/news\/424909<\/a><\/p>\n

– Times of Israel (Araghchi “bombing pharmaceutical companies” quote, strike confirmed both sides): https:\/\/www.timesofisrael.com\/liveblog_entry\/acknowledging-strike-iran-fm-claims-fentanyl-factory-only-supplying-hospital-drugs\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– AP via Daily Gazette (IDF claim and Iran denial both carried, fentanyl hospital use): https:\/\/www.dailygazette.com\/ap\/national\/the-latest-trump-says-the-military-could-end-its-iran-offensive-in-2-to-3\/article_170b3d0a-5b14-5a15-aef8-467334db41b0.html<\/a><\/p>\n

– CTC West Point (January 2025 \u2014 Iran fentanyl weapons programme, SPND, Moscow theater): https:\/\/ctc.westpoint.edu\/tehrans-tactical-knockout-weaponized-pharmaceutical-based-agents\/<\/p>\n

– State Department OPCW July 2025 via FDD (Iran “produced fentanyl-based munitions” \u2014 note FDD advocacy-driven, State Dept statement cited independently): https:\/\/www.fdd.org\/analysis\/2026\/02\/24\/countering-irans-covert-chemical-weapons-program\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Story 6 \u2014 FOUR HUMANS ARE GOING TO THE MOON TONIGHT<\/p>\n

– NASA mission page (primary \u2014 crew, launch window, countdown, weather 80%): https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/artemis-ii\/<\/p>\n

– NASA countdown blog (all systems go, April 1 launch confirmed): https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/blogs\/missions\/2026\/03\/31\/nasa-teams-readying-artemis-ii-moon-rocket-for-launch\/<\/p>\n

– CBS News (crew confirmed, 252,000-mile distance, April 10 splashdown, Wiseman quote): https:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/news\/nasa-artemis-ii-moon-launch-astronauts-flight-plan\/<\/a><\/p>\n

– Live Science (April 1 launch live coverage, free-return trajectory, 10-day mission): https:\/\/www.livescience.com\/space\/live\/artemis-ii-launch-tuesday-march-31<\/a><\/p>\n

– Wikipedia\/Artemis II (records compiled \u2014 Glover, Koch, Hansen, Wiseman): https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Artemis_II<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Day 33 | Iran War & Beyond Weekday morning and evening editions. Saturdays once. Sundays once. All sources labeled. Translator notes on every story. WAR DAY 33 | NUMBERS AT PUBLICATION \ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddf7 Iran: 1,937 killed, 24,800+ wounded (Iran Deputy Health Ministry \u2014 last official update). HRANA independent estimate: 3,200+. Iran International: 4,700+ security forces killed. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":446,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_oxygen_hide_in_design_set":false,"_oxygen_tags":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[143],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-patreon"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=447"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/446"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rudymartinez.wtf\/stuff-and-nonsense\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}